DataMystic

Is there any way to stop (Cancel) a long running execution from code, like user can do from UI ?

I'm expecially target at the TexPipeEngine.

Thanks.

In multi-thread scenario, with .NET C#, when I close the application TextPipe raise an error (runtime error 217 at...).
I've attached a project in C # where I replicated the error.

Thanks.

I've found this issue with a restrict without subfilter ( I know is a wrong filter, but my app is building it dynamically) Filter options | [ ] Log to file | [ ] Append to logfile | Log filename: | Threshold 0 | |--Input from file(s) | [ ] Confirm before processing each file | [ ] Confirm before pro...

just downloaded it.
I will post some feedback soon.

thank.

Thansk a lot for the speed of your fix.

I've found some issue in error handling: First I never found anything in the errorText property also when the execute method return a non-zero value Second ther are some condition that correctly return error in TextPipe but not in TextPipe Engine. To check this I've exported some simple filter in vb...

I've found a different (wrong) behavior from TP 8.3.2 to TP 8.4.2 / 8.4.3 in the escape sequence The simpler filter to reproduce it is an | |--Add right margin [\\end] | the old versione correctly escape the slash and give me this output ( in the trial area with the default text): You can type sampl...

Export to VBScript (but also to JScript) loose any definition of Mainframe Copybook Filters. I've a filter like this: [...] | |--Comment... | before Copybook | |--Mainframe Copybook [ ****************************************************************** * FIRST COPYBOOK * ] | |--Comment... | after Copy...

It sound very complete and usefull.
It will be easy to use and it can have grat performance too.

It sound better to remove field by field name or number. But ... If it is after the Copybook that file has already converted 60+ fields ( EBCDIC, Packed Decimal , etc...) just to pass it to the discad filter that keep 8 fields. If it is before the Copybook it must know the Copybook format. so to hav...

I have many situation in which I need to convert a very big and complex mainframe file using the copybook filter. It work fine but when I need to convert only a limited subset of the available fields is far more faster to delete the unneeded byte range and then use the filter on a copybook modified ...