Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these values

Get help with installation and running here.

Moderators: DataMystic Support, Moderators, DataMystic Support, Moderators, DataMystic Support, Moderators

Post Reply
dfhtextpipe
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:49 am
Location: UK

Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these values

Post by dfhtextpipe »

The maximum number of rows allowed under Using these values seems to be much lower than it used to be.

I now find that I cannot add more than 4 rows in such a table.
Once I scroll down to make empty row 5 visible, I find that I cannot edit the fifth row, as it will not accept the cursor.

Was this an intended change, or some flook that crept in to the code?
I suspect it's a GUI bug, as I'm pretty sure that old filters with more than 4 rows still work as originally designed.

David
David
User avatar
DataMystic Support
Site Admin
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 12:32 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these valu

Post by DataMystic Support »

Hi David,

I wasn't able to reproduce this issue, but you can always work around it by putting the cursor in the row above and tabbing twice to create a new row for you.
dfhtextpipe
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:49 am
Location: UK

Re: Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these valu

Post by dfhtextpipe »

Thanks.

That works - at least on a fresh filter - though the problem did really occur the other day.

David
David
User avatar
DataMystic Support
Site Admin
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 12:32 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these valu

Post by DataMystic Support »

I believe you! But I need to be able to reproduce it.
dfhtextpipe
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:49 am
Location: UK

Re: Search replace list : Number of rows in Using these valu

Post by dfhtextpipe »

Yesterday, even I was unable to reproduce it. If it happens again, I'll be sure to report further.
David
Post Reply