DataMystic

Is there any good reason why the filter to Convert Word documents to text leaves the BOM in the UTF-8 text output file?

The help page for this filter does not state that the BOM may need to be removed afterwards!

Best regards,

David

At the start of the file? Or at other locations?

At the usual place for a BOM - the start of the file.

Aside: I don't regard U+FEFF ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE [BOM, ZWNBSP] : BOM, ZWNBSP at any other location as a BOM.
In other locations, it functions as a ZWNBSP, which was not part of my report.

Best regards,

David

I will adjust the help file to include this.

In the early days of Unicode, the naming convention was
- UTF-8 without BOM
- UTF-8

The latter had the BOM implicitly.

More recently, the naming convention has changed to
- UTF-8
- UTF-8 with BOM

The former now has no BOM implicitly.

The convention change was recognized and implemented by the Notepad++ text editor developers several years back.
i.e. In the respective options of its Encoding menu.

It behoves TextPipe to also recognize the change and for the UI and Help files to be consistent to the current convention.

David

My comment of June 6 last year is also relevant to the use of UTF-8 in the new JSON text format for saved filter files in TextPipe v11.4

Has anything been done to remove the BOM from text files output by the Word documents to text filter?

David

Yes - this was removed in TextPipe 11.4

Thanks Simon.

David