DataMystic

Posted: **Sun May 24, 2020 10:34 pm**

If you have a lot of non-ASCII text that you want to format as the search items in an external replace list file,
it would be very useful to be able to prepare that list using TextPipe as the tool.

This would require a new filter called Unicode to Perl Escape Codes.

Likewise for the replace column, a filter called Unicode to UTF-8 Byte Codes would be useful too.

Adding both of these to the Filter library would be a really good enhancement.

Best regards,

David

Posted: **Mon Dec 28, 2020 6:43 am**

Hi David, this sounds like a filter list that could be prepared, rather than an internal filter.

If you design one we're happy to include it in the TextPipe distribution.

Posted: **Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:37 am**

Hi Simon,

A filter list would be somewhat unwieldy!

It would need to have 143859 entries - one for each named character in Unicode 13.0.

Given that the outputs are eminently calculable, it would be simpler (and surely much less effort) to design two suitable internal filters.

And using formulae for the task would ensure that the filters would be intrinsically extended whenever a new version of Unicode is announced.

David

Posted: **Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:49 pm**

Hi David,

Can't this already be done?

Just use a restriction to match each line in turn, or the replace column:

For the Unicode to Perl Escape Codes
1. Hex dump
2. Add left margin of \x{
3. Add right margin of }

For the Unicode to UTF-8 Byte Codes
1. Hex dump
2. Search for 2 hex bytes, and add a \x before them

Posted: **Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:55 pm**

Hi Simon,

For codepoints 00-FF (in the ANSI range), the leading

Code: Select all

should be omitted, e.g.

Code: Select all

\x{00A0}

becomes simply

Code: Select all

 \x{A0}

because these are single byte characters.

Many UTF-8 byte codes are more than 2 bytes! e.g. ﾀ is

Code: Select all

\xEF\xBE\x80

And beyond the BMP, each Unicode character requires 4 bytes.

So yes, but it would be nice if all this could be done under the hood by means of internal filters!

David

Posted: **Wed Jan 06, 2021 7:14 am**

Let's take Unicode to UTF-8 Byte Codes.

If we assume the Unicode is in UTF-8 form already (if not, just use a filter to convert it), then all you need to do is

1. Restrict to the text (a line or column)
2. Hex dump
3. Use a pattern match to match 2 hex characters at a time, and add \x{ } around it. If the text is handled a byte at a time, it doesn't matter how many bytes are in a sequence. And provided the text is converted to utf-8 at the start, the byte sequence will be correct.

Does that make sense?

Posted: **Fri Jan 08, 2021 6:06 am**

No - that makes no sense to me!

Perl Escape Codes for Unicode characters have a variable number of bytes, depending upon how each character is represented in UTF-8.

Squishing everything to 2 bytes would not work for their use in external character replacement list files (such as tab delimited), as described when I added this topic.

David

Posted: **Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:32 am**

I am not suggested everything gets squished to 2 bytes.

Please see sample filter attached.

convert each line to Perl Escape Codes.zip: (1.01 KiB) Downloaded 1802 times

Posted: **Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:05 am**

Dear Simon,

The outputs are not proper Perl Escape codes that would be recognised by a PCRE replace filter.
For codepoints beyond \xFF the should be {braces} around each character code!
e.g.

Code: Select all

ðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ
ĀāĂăĄąĆćĈĉĊċČčĎď
𐀀𐀁𐀂𐀃𐀄𐀅𐀆𐀇𐀈𐀉𐀊𐀋𐀌𐀍𐀎𐀏

should convert to

Code: Select all

\xF0\xF1\xF2\xF3\xF4\xF5\xF6\xF7\xF8\xF9\xFA\xFB\xFC\xFD\xFE\xFF
\x{0100}\x{0101}\x{0102}\x{0103}\x{0104}\x{0105}\x{0106}\x{0107}\x{0108}\x{0109}\x{010A}\x{010B}\x{010C}\x{010D}\x{010E}\x{010F}
\x{10000}\x{10001}\x{10002}\x{10003}\x{10004}\x{10005}\x{10006}\x{10007}\x{10008}\x{10009}\x{1000A}\x{1000B}\x{1000C}\x{1000D}\x{1000E}\x{1000F}

David

Posted: **Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:03 am**

Does PCRE need to care if a character is two bytes or not? Can't it just match the sequence? Isn't it an "all or nothing" literal comparison?

Posted: **Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:00 pm**

As I use PCRE Perl Escape codes in a lot of my replace lists for TextPipe, I think I know what I'm talking about.

Also, btw, most ASCII characters never need to be converted to Perl Escape Codes for use in replace lists.
Those should also be excluded if you do implement the suggestion as an internal TextPipe filter.

Currently, I use BabelPad to convert text to Perl Escape Codes (for search) & to UTF-8 byte codes (for replace).
Even so, I still need to simplify the Escape codes for codespoints in the range \x81 to \xFF,
ie, by removing the {00 and }.

David

DataMystic

Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter

Re: Suggestion: Provide Unicode to Perl Escape Codes filter